RENOGY UL Listed 250W Watt Monocrystalline Black Solar Panel

August 9, 2014 - Comment

Electrical Specifications Optimum Operating Voltage (Vmp): 31.64V Optimum Operating Current (Imp): 7.9 A Open – Circuit Voltage (Voc): 37.78 V Short- Circuit Current (Isc): 8.35 A Maximum Power at STC: 250 W Operating Module Temperature: -40°C to + 90°C Cell Efficiency 18.1% Module Efficiency 15.3% Maximum System Voltage: 600 V DC (UL) / 1000 V

Buy Now! $349.99Amazon.com Price
(as of 11:01 GMT+1200 - Details)

Electrical Specifications
Optimum Operating Voltage (Vmp): 31.64V
Optimum Operating Current (Imp): 7.9 A
Open – Circuit Voltage (Voc): 37.78 V
Short- Circuit Current (Isc): 8.35 A
Maximum Power at STC: 250 W
Operating Module Temperature: -40°C to + 90°C
Cell Efficiency 18.1%
Module Efficiency 15.3%
Maximum System Voltage: 600 V DC (UL) / 1000 V DC (IEC)
Maximum Series Fuse Rating: 15A
STC: Irradiance 1000 W/m2, module temperature 25°C, AM=1.5;
Mechanical Specifications
Solar Cell: Mono-crystalline 156 x 156 mm (6 inches)
No. of cells: 60 (6 x 10)
Dimensions: 65 x 39 x 1.57 in (1650 x 990 x 40 mm)
Weight: 41.9 lbs (19.0 kg)
Front Glass: 3.2 mm (.13 in) tempered glass
Frame: Anodized aluminum alloy
Junction Box: IP67 rated
Output Cables: 4.0 mm2 (.006 in2), 1200mm(39.4inches)
Connectors: MC4 compatible
UL Listed: UL 1703
Fire Rating: Class C

Product Features

  • Top Ranked PTC Rating (California Energy Commission Performance rating)
  • High Modules Conversion Efficiency
  • Guaranteed Positive Output Tolerance (0-3%): You get more than you pay for!
  • Delivered ready for connection, Withstand high wind (2400 Pa) and snow loads (5400 Pa)
  • Excellent performance in low light environments: California Energy Commission test shows our performance ranks top 5%

Comments

Ray E. says:

Superior Quality Panel This Solar panel is awesome. The quality of build, fit and finish is superior, and I would definitely buy more. I have this connected to a micro grid inverter, and It’s almost 80% efficient which is not what I was expecting, compared to the 65% to 70% efficiency that other folks have been seeing with their panels…. So far it has far exceeded my expectations ….*************Update***************************I’m changing my view towards this panel, because i don’t feel it’s worth the extra money, and it’s efficiency is way lower than even a 240 watt Poly panel. The look & finish are great on this panel, and that’s why I didn’t reduce my rating to only 1 star, but this panel should be rated way lower than 250 watts…I have now purchased 2×240 watt Poly panles that outperform this panel in any light condition, and they cost almost 1/2 as much …This panel is not even on the California list of approved panels for rebates, because I’m assuming is not…

Alan The Tinkerer says:

Top notch solar panels 0

Write a comment

*

3 + 18 =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.